RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Supracondylar fractures of the humerus (SCH) are the most common fractures about the elbow in children that require operative stabilization. Considering the possible complications involved including nerve deficit and compartment syndrome, documentation is crucial to good patient care. It also is of prime importance for justification or defense of our care should this arise. One of the common concerns in transition from written documentation to an electronic medical record (EMR) is availability of proper documentation. We sought to develop an established EMR protocol to streamline and improve proper care and documentation for SCH fractures. This was in response to poor documentation in an initial retrospective evaluation. METHODS: Documentation before and after the implementation of a clinical pathway were compared. A retrospective chart review was used to collect documentation information before the implementation of the clinical pathway and a prospective study design was used to collect information after the implementation of the clinical pathway. Proportions of preclinical and postclinical pathway documentation were compared before and after the implementation of the clinical pathway using a χ test, or the Fisher exact test for measures in which at least 20% of the expected frequencies were <5. A 2-sided 0.05 α level was used to define statistical significance. RESULTS: We saw an improvement in documentation after implementation of the clinical pathway, with statistically significant differences in nursing preoperative, physician preoperative, and physician postoperative. Nursing postanesthesia care unit, nursing postoperative, and physician clinic follow-up trended toward improvement but did not meet statistical significance. Although we did see improvement, we still did not meet ideal 100% documentation in all categories. CONCLUSIONS: Documentation is crucial to good medical care and legal defense should any arise. The implementation of a clinical pathway demonstrated significant improvement by physicians and nurses. Although overall improvement was obtained, there were areas associated with EMR identified that still require further improvement. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.
